Digitus Impudicus

Yeah, right. Are you done kissing dead pope's asses and gettin' ready to defend Tom Delay? (JB)

(Why would I hide from by blog-bitch?)
 

JB,
You run anytime you caught lying.
 

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
 

Ahh. My old friend JB. Do I detect a heightened level of hostility and vitriol from your corner? Is that because Mike's been bouncing around the web, claiming to have pounded your ass like a railroad spike?

You would hide because you value your self-esteem, my friend. Getting rhetorically pantsed can be humiliating. Unless you're in to that sort of thing, in which case I'd be more than happy oblige when time allows.

Heh. "Blog-bitch." I like it.
 

Mike, no hiding about it. You got cut off because you are an idiot. It's THAT simple. You bring NOTHING. Now, Kenny-boy, you've got a few things to answer for which you have chosen not to. Not hyperbole mind you, but straight shots. So knock off the trite, cute little comments you probably lifted from some right-wing radio personality like Mike Weiner, er, Savage, or someone like that. No shit on the idiot thing, Mike, dude, you are stupid. You can even ask ALL the other people on your blog. (JB)
 

JB,
Just because I do not agree with you, does not make me stupid. The fact that you can not back up you point of view, yet continue too insist that you are correct is stupid. Which is an "a typical" liberal position.
 

JB,
I remind you (again) that you are resorting to name calling. In essence, you have already lost the debate.
 

No debate about it. You ARE an idiot. But just to be fair.... I will quit referring to you as such, even though it's true, if you can bring five different people in here to tell me I am wrong. Godd luck! (JB)
 

JB,
The problem for you is this forum
is suppose to be about idea's,
law's , current event's, not just
about a person's personality.
You display the same condesending
attitude I have experienced from
liberals since I took my first
class at UC Berkley. You have no
factual basis for an attack, yet
continue to do so. Anyone, who
disagrees with you, is an idiot.
Anyone, who challenges you on your
assertions, is not worthy of an
answer. There is no contrition
from you, when it is clear to
everyone that you were incorrect.
While I am sure you "feel" better
about yourself by posting "you are
an idiot". The truth is you are
not participating in any debate
of any the of issues at hand.
 

ARE YOU FUCKIN' SLOW??????????? NOT JUST "ANYONE" WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS AN IDIOT. YOU ARE A FUCKIN' IDIOT. DO YOU GET IT YET YOU MORON?
 

JB,
Yeah I got it. Your an overblown gasbag with the intellegence of hydrogen.
 

The contraction of "you are" as "you're" and the spelling of "intelligence" escape mental giants like you all the time. I've been trying to help you, but there's nothing I can do until you admit that you have a problem. (Sigh) (JB)
 

JB,
Take your own advice, first.
You have problems with logic, reason, factual information and standing behind what you write.
I am still waiting to hear again about you "truth checking". Although I do not expect your contrition over what you wrote.
Since, of course, you are never wrong.
PS: I'll worry about my spelling.
 

So then, what is it exactly have I said that isn't true? (According to you) (JB)
 

JB,
I will give the most blatant example. I said the DNC/Providian put out a credit card offer of 23.99%. You stated "truth checked" this and the offer is really 9.99%. You later revised your statement to 9.99 - 15.99%. I asked you for your source, you refused. So I gave you the link to the web site which clearly states 9.99-23.99% . see:
(https://www.providiancard.com/
NASApp/bap/dnc/jump.jsp)
This means you did not research your information nor did you provide proof of said information.
That means you intentionally put out false information.
 

I FACTCHECKED THE WEB SITE AND I STATED EXACTLY THAT YOU IDIOT!!! YOUR ORIGINAL POST SAID 23.99% AND NOTHING ABOUT THE 9.99%% GO BACK AND LOOK WHAT I SAID IN RESPONSE TO YOUR ORIGINAL POST. YOU WERE QUOTING YOUR NEIGHBOR OR WHATEVER AND YOU ONLY MENTIONED THE 23.99% LIKE IT WAS THE BASE RATE. I BUSTED YOU WITH EXACTLY THAT INFORMATION! I TOLD YOU I WENT TO THE WEB SITE, WHICH I DID. I DIDN'T REVISE SHIT YOU STUPID COCKSUCKING IDIOT.
 

Well I notice the original post about the 23.99% credit card offer your neighbor got that you were ranting about is gone. I don't know if it automatically archived or what....but your original post was all about how terrible it was to have such a high rate and how stupid someone would be to take a credit card over 10%. Remember? I went to the website and found that 23.99% was the default rate not the regular rate like you were suggesting. SO LIKE I SAID....IF YOUR NEIGHBOR GOT A CREDIT CARD OFFER OF 23.99%, THEY HAVE A CRAPPY CREDIT RATING! YOU ARE STUDPID AND DELUSIONAL. I am all but certain that I am not the only person who knows this. (JB)
 

Kenny-boy? Mike has been bouncing around the web saying what? And they know what he's talking about? Where are they? There's nobody here but you, me and your stupid friend. Now, if I am to be afraid of you, why don't you respond to some of my posts where the ball is clearly in your court? As far as I can tell your trite, stupid-ass remark about 8$ and hyperbole at Tully's doesn't end an argument. Canned remarks you are so anxious to use that you use them at inappropriate times don't exactly rate you as a genius either, so why do you do it? You are not Limbaugh, Hannity or any of the other right-wing clowns who can shout people down and turn off their micophones so you can't use the same tactics they do. An objective reader would probably realize in short order what the deal is. (JB)
 

Kenny-boy? Mike has been bouncing around the web saying what? And they know what he's talking about? Where are they? There's nobody here but you, me and your stupid friend. Now, if I am to be afraid of you, why don't you respond to some of my posts where the ball is clearly in your court? As far as I can tell your trite, stupid-ass remark about 8$ and hyperbole at Tully's doesn't end an argument. Canned remarks you are so anxious to use that you use them at inappropriate times don't exactly rate you as a genius either, so why do you do it? You are not Limbaugh, Hannity or any of the other right-wing clowns who can shout people down and turn off their micophones so you can't use the same tactics they do. An objective reader would probably realize in short order what the deal is. (JB)
 

Kenny-boy? Mike has been bouncing around the web saying what? And they know what he's talking about? Where are they? There's nobody here but you, me and your stupid friend. Now, if I am to be afraid of you, why don't you respond to some of my posts where the ball is clearly in your court? As far as I can tell your trite, stupid-ass remark about 8$ and hyperbole at Tully's doesn't end an argument. Canned remarks you are so anxious to use that you use them at inappropriate times don't exactly rate you as a genius either, so why do you do it? You are not Limbaugh, Hannity or any of the other right-wing clowns who can shout people down and turn off their micophones so you can't use the same tactics they do. An objective reader would probably realize in short order what the deal is. (JB)
 

STUPID, THAT IS. YES IT WAS A TYPO.
 

STUPID, THAT IS. YES IT WAS A TYPO.
 

(STUPID, that is. Yes, it was a typo)

So, Mike, if that credit card offer is like any other offer, why did you write a post about it to begin with? What was your problem with it? You made your whole ideological rant based on the 23.99% rate and the 1% refund which could be optionally donated to the DNC.
So are you gonna apply for the damned thing now? Why did you bitch about it to begin with? (JB)
 

JB,
The offer my neighbor recieved was ONLY for the 23.99% rate. You insisted that this is not true. You later tried to revise your response by stating that the rate was between 9.99 and 15.99%. (read your own post in the archive section.) This is also untrue. Face it, you are busted. So as you continue to rant on, who's the idiot?
 

JB,
Next point, CO2 being a "predominent" gas. As in "most common". Of the gases in our atmoshphere only Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon are in higher concentrations. CO2 is found in all ice core samples. And CO2 is a component of photosynthesis. A chemical process which plant life processes CO2 and produces oxygen. According to the Vostok Ice Core samples, at least 4 times in the last 400,000 years, CO2 levels are equal to or higher than today. See:
http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/records/GCMD_CDIAC_CO2_VOSTOK_ICECORE.html
This can not happen unless there are other factors, than man, that is producing this gas.
 

WELL ACTUALLY, YOU STUPID MORON, YOU BITCHED ABOUT THE 23.99% RATE, I TOLD YOU THAT YOUR NEIGHBOR MUST HAVE SOME CRAPPY CREDIT. I DOUBT THAT I AM WRONG ON THAT POINT OR ELSE HE/SHE WOULD'VE GOT A BETTER OFFER.
THE ATMOSPHERE HAS MORE HYDRODGEN IN IT THAT CO2. YOU ARE STILL A VERY OPIONIONATED, YET STUPID IDIOT. IF YOU WERE HALF WORTH A SHIT, YOU WOULD BE RUNNING THE COUNTRY INSTEAD OF TALKING A BUNCH OF SHIT ON YOUR BITCH FRIENDS' BLOG.

DON'T TRY AGAIN TO APPEAL TO LOGIC AND REASON AS LONG AS YOU ARE USING THE "APPEAL TO AUTHORITY" THAT "EVERYONE KNOWS" OR EVERYONE AGREES" WHEN IT'S ONLY YOU AND KENNY-BOY. YOU ARE LONELIER THAN YOU REALIZE. (JB)
 

JB,
Logic means that you, not I, must admit that you ASSUMED you knew what the original offer was to the individual in question. You did NOT KNOW and have NEVER admitted you were wrong.
I admitted that the person who received the offer had gone thru a divorce recently. As for the atmospere percentage, cite your source. Mine are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_atmosphere or
http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfjps/1400/atmos_origin.html to name a few with graphic breakdowns.
JB, you know, SHOUTING does not make you right. Neither does making disparging remarks about my intelligence, when you do not get your facts right.